GCWPA 2026/01/19 Frank Chen 中文 內容

NATS | Detailed Valuation Derivation
Civilization Bitcoin 2.0 & Civilization RWA 2.0
Coin × Equity Integration (NASDAQ Context)
2030 / 2035 Strategic Price Range Methodology
1. Valuation Philosophy: Where the Price Comes From
The projected 2030 and 2035 price ranges for NATS are not derived from token trading metrics, technical indicators, or speculative crypto cycles.
Instead, the valuation is derived through a top-down capital-market approach, consistent with how new asset categories are priced on NASDAQ:
Asset Category Definition
→ Reasonable Total Market Capitalization
→ Effective Circulating Supply
→ Implied Per-Unit Value
This approach aligns with institutional valuation practices used for:
2. Step One: Asset Category Positioning (2030 / 2035)
2030 Asset Category Positioning
By 2030, assuming successful Coin × Equity integration and NASDAQ listing, NATS is no longer classified as:
Instead, it is positioned as:
A Civilization-Grade Digital Reserve Asset
with Public-Market Anchoring
Key assumptions for 2030:
-
Civilization-based RWA becomes a recognized investment theme
-
Cultural, heritage, and sovereign-grade assets are partially securitized
-
NATS is among the first liquid, listed examples in this category
2035 Asset Category Evolution
By 2035, under further institutional adoption:
-
Civilization assets are included in long-duration portfolios
-
RWA 2.0 expands beyond real estate and bonds into civilizational assets
-
At least one sovereign or supranational entity acknowledges civilization-grade digital reserves
NATS’ positioning evolves into:
A Civilization-Grade Reserve Asset
Anchored by a NASDAQ-Listed Public Entity
This represents a category upgrade, not merely price appreciation.
3. Step Two: Deriving a Reasonable Total Market Capitalization
(A) 2030 Total Market Capitalization Range
The valuation benchmark is not individual crypto tokens, but asset-class comparables, including:
-
Bitcoin (as a reserve asset, without civilizational backing)
-
The global art & cultural asset market (≈15% CAGR)
-
Sovereign cultural funds and national heritage programs
Using conservative capital-market assumptions:
-
Civilization assets remain a minor but legitimate allocation class
-
NATS is a first-mover, publicly anchored reference asset
A reasonable, externally defensible market-cap range for 2030 is:
USD 300 billion – 600 billion
(An aggressive upside case may reach USD 1.2 trillion, but this is not used for public-facing guidance.)
(B) 2035 Total Market Capitalization Range
By 2035, if civilization-grade assets achieve institutional legitimacy:
-
They function as long-duration reserve assets
-
They partially overlap with the role of gold and Bitcoin
-
Public markets recognize a distinct civilization-asset category
Under conservative institutional adoption assumptions:
2035 reasonable total market capitalization range:
USD 1.5 trillion – 3.0 trillion
(Extreme success scenarios may exceed this range internally, but are not required for the base thesis.)
4. Step Three: Determining Effective Circulating Supply
Institutional analysts do not value assets using nominal total supply.
They use effective circulating supply.
For NATS:
-
Total supply: 100 million (fixed, non-inflationary)
-
Long-term strategic reserves & lockups: ~50%
-
Civilization-reserve characteristics imply persistent illiquidity
Therefore, the valuation-relevant effective supply is:
Approximately 50 million NATS
This assumption is conservative and consistent with reserve-asset behavior.
5. Step Four: Implied Per-Unit Valuation
2030 Price Range Derivation
| Assumption |
Value |
| Total Market Cap |
USD 300B – 600B |
| Effective Supply |
50 million |
Implied Value per NATS:
-
300B ÷ 50M ≈ USD 6,000
-
600B ÷ 50M ≈ USD 12,000
2030 External Strategic Range:
USD 6,000 – 12,000 per NATS
2035 Price Range Derivation
| Assumption |
Value |
| Total Market Cap |
USD 1.5T – 3.0T |
| Effective Supply |
50 million |
Implied Value per NATS:
-
1.5T ÷ 50M ≈ USD 30,000
-
3.0T ÷ 50M ≈ USD 60,000
2035 External Strategic Range:
USD 30,000 – 50,000+ per NATS
(USD 60,000+ represents a high-success internal scenario.)
6. Why These Ranges Are Capital-Market Reasonable
These valuation ranges are considered reasonable within NASDAQ frameworks because:
-
They are derived from asset-class positioning, not token speculation
-
They rely on explicit assumptions (market cap & effective supply)
-
They are expressed as ranges, not single-point forecasts
-
They align with how new categories are historically priced in public markets
7. Analyst-Ready One-Sentence Explanation
The 2030 and 2035 valuation ranges for NATS are derived by positioning it as a civilization-grade reserve asset, estimating a reasonable total market capitalization for that category, and dividing by effective circulating supply — not by projecting token prices.
8. Summary Table (Investor Deck Ready)
| Year |
Strategic Price Range (USD / NATS) |
Category Position |
| 2025 (IEO) |
≈ 2 |
Civilization asset entry point |
| 2030 |
6,000 – 12,000 |
Civilization RWA mainstreaming |
| 2035 |
30,000 – 50,000+ |
Civilization-grade reserve asset |
9. Disclosure Language (Recommended for NASDAQ Materials)